There is something about this feeling of negating to saying the truth by negating that he equated to like the negation of your your will like the acetic lifestyle. Hegel in his logic mystics journey towards the positive pull of truth only by the absolute negativity topic I get it really you then got negative you got East ein louder next well and this like you know we've talked about this before when talking about meditation but there is something about just the pounding on your rational faculties that paradoxes provide yeah which seems to have word yes exactly. It's super cool itI do remember I don't know where I study it but about this this view of like what's called negative theology that
David and Tamler talk about William James’ chapter on mysticism from his book "Varieties of Religious Experience." What defines a mystical experience? Why do they defy expression and yet feel like a state of knowledge, a glimpse into the window of some undiscovered aspect of reality? Is Tamler right that David has a little mystic inside of him just waiting to burst forth from his breast?
Plus – another edition of VBW does conceptual analysis and we’re sticking with ‘c’ words – this time the definitive theory of ‘creepy.’
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: