The Role of Feeders in the Ethics Committee

I'm arguing that he's only doing it in within a Russian context, where he's not particularly putting it into this dispute. I get your point, but... Well, I thought it was a feeder made some statesman that you cannot just support the Russian aggression like he's doing. But my main point is that the argument you are coming with is something the ethics committee could then conclude. From a feeder's perspective, well, if you take someone who does something and you ban it for him, if he then continues doing it in an even worse manner, people think would be to sort of initiate a new case.