AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Is the Attachment Different From That Which Is Observed?
When we observe is the fact that which is happening as attachment and the consequences of that attachment, when you observe is the observer different from the thing he observes? You have understood my question? When you become, when you are angry, at the moment of anger there is no division between the observer and the observed. Only a second later comes the division. Where there is division there must be conflict. That is law, that is a law. So do we see this non-analytically but factually? Now when you say, I see it, is the fear different from that which he has seen? Are you following this? It is, sir, where there isdivision there must