The First Laws of Truth

i'm just wonderingi misinterpreting it, or why that's the case. Truth comes on the scene in this extra moral sense, right? So there's sort of utilitarian beginning. What nicha wants to suggest is there's a time at which people doing this its inconvenient and can be positively harmful. Messing upa signation like poisonous or predator can be difficult. But what we hate is basically not deception itself, but rather the unpleasant, hated consequences of certain sorts of deception. And then it's two pages later or so, maybe for where nitia finally gets around to coming back to that question. Wait, we still don't know where the drive for truth comes