learners claim galaxies seen in the james webb appear too old. He says they should not be so well formed at four to 500 million years old, and therefore must pre date the hypothesise time line for the big bang. How would you respond to that claim? So the process of galactic evolution is actually a totally separate and distinct field,. as distint and separate, from the study of d and a. But he does make the point again that refutes his own claims. Says there should be a time it which in the big mang monel there are no galaxies. That's called the cosmic micrave background, or the cosmic dark ages. And in fact, we do not see