I Think There'd Be a Rejoinder, if He's Going to Service This Theory

i think there'd be a really interesting rejoinder. But i also don't know whether whether he's going to service this theory and his questions, i wonder. Can imagine him doing it in questioning the state, like asking, almost like a friendly question, icould se tat? Do you agree that it would be a special justification for overruling ro and casey if we think that abortion is disproportionately used to de value black life?