The Battle Between Soldier and Scout Mindsets

21min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

This chapter delves into the metaphor of soldier mindset versus scout mindset, discussing how individuals defend beliefs despite evidence against them. It explores the importance of seeking truth and forming accurate understandings of reality, rather than defending preconceived notions. The conversation also touches on the challenges of being rational in social contexts and the balance between staying open-minded and discerning what is worth investigating.

Mom, apple pie, and rationality — all things that are unquestionably good, right? But rationality, as much as we might value it, is easier to aspire to than to achieve. And there are more than a few hot takes on the market suggesting that we shouldn’t even want to be rational — that it’s inefficient or maladaptive. Julia Galef is here to both stand up for the value of being rational, and to explain how we can better achieve it. She distinguishes between the “soldier mindset,” where we believe what we’re told about the world and march toward a goal, and the “scout mindset,” where we’re open-minded about what’s out there and always asking questions. She makes a compelling case that all things considered, it’s better to be a scout.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Julia Galef received a BA in statistics from Columbia University. She is currently a writer and host of the Rationally Speaking podcast. She was a co-founder and president of the Center for Applied Rationality. Her new book is The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don’t.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.