The catch off for security is these investment contract as sharing a company when you're buying equity is just a defined term within security and so it's default going to be a secure. So those equity securities that you're saying are 100% securities now just because you have included trading cards in the broader transaction. This is I think a pretty good analogy for what the SEC is trying to claim here which in that instance it becomes abundantly clear what a ridiculous stance it is. That is ultimately the analogy that needs to get forcefully applied in a lot of these cases like this.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode