Interpretation of the Appointment of Officials in Legal Cases

OA1052

CAAAANNNONNNNNBALLLLLL! Judge Aileen Cannon has just made a major splash in the Trump trials by dismissing the entire federal classified documents case based on her findings that special prosecutor Jack Smith was unlawfully appointed.  We try our best to pretend that this 93-page decision is a regular order released by a normal judge, at least for a few minutes, before moving on to ask: Should we have seen this coming? Does this explain Clarence Thomas’s weirdly unprompted thoughts on the same subject in the Trump immunity case earlier this month? What happens next, and is there any chance it could happen without Fort Pierce, Florida’s best, worst, and only federal judge? 

BONUS PATRON CONTENT: Patrons will also hear us listen to the New York Times rub its collective chin as its The Daily podcast considers Aileen Cannon’s mysterious ways and unknowable motives.

•  Aileen Cannon's 93-page order granting Trump ‘s motion to dismiss 

• 28 U.S. Code § 533  (Investigative and other officials; appointment)

• United States v. Nixon :: 418 U.S. 683 (1974)

•  What We Can Learn from American History's First Special Prosecutor, TIME (1/5/19)

If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!