This chapter examines the copyright office's requirement for artists to disclose AI-generated portions in their work and disclaim ownership over those portions. The potential impact on artists' willingness to use AI in their creative process is discussed, along with concerns about dishonesty and the loss of innovative works.
NLW looks at three arguments around AI and copyright and why the current contentious approach being taken by some authors, publishers, and policymakers may not hold up long term.
Including excerpts from:
Does the First Amendment Confer a ‘Right to Compute’? The Future of AI May Depend on It - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-the-first-amendment-confer-a-right-to-compute-the-future-of-ai-may-depend-on-it/
The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated art https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/09/opinion-dont-exclude-ai-generated-art-from-copyright/
My Books Were Used to Train Meta’s Generative AI. Good. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/09/books3-database-meta-training-ai/675461/
TAKE OUR SURVEY ON EDUCATIONAL AND LEARNING RESOURCE CONTENT: https://bit.ly/aibreakdownsurvey
ABOUT THE AI BREAKDOWN
The AI Breakdown helps you understand the most important news and discussions in AI.
Subscribe to The AI Breakdown newsletter: https://theaibreakdown.beehiiv.com/subscribe
Subscribe to The AI Breakdown on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheAIBreakdown
Join the community: bit.ly/aibreakdown
Learn more: http://breakdown.network/