Colonial Legacies and Governance Challenges

16min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

This chapter explores the moral complexities of colonialism, examining its negative impacts while recognizing some unintended benefits like infrastructure improvements. It highlights the relationship between historical legacies and contemporary governance, focusing on Colombia and Bolivia, and emphasizes the importance of rigorous methodologies in social science. The conversation delves into the nuances of institutions within political economy, contrasting extractive and inclusive systems while underscoring the role of cultural factors in shaping effective governance.

One common feature of complex systems is sensitive dependence on initial conditions: a small change in how systems begin evolving can lead to large differences in their later behavior. In the social sphere, this is a way of saying that history matters. But it can be hard to quantify how much certain specific historical events have affected contemporary conditions, because the number of variables is so large and their impacts are so interdependent. Political economist Jean-Paul Faguet and collaborators have examined one case where we can closely measure the impact today of events from centuries ago: how Colombian communities are still affected by 16th-century encomienda, a colonial forced-labor institution. We talk about this and other examples of the legacy of history.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/26/287-jean-paul-faguet-on-institutions-and-the-legacy-of-history/

Jean-Paul Faguet received a Ph.D. in Political Economy and an M.Sc. in Economics from the London School of Economics, and an Master of Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. He is currently Professor of the Political Economy of Development at LSE. He serves as the Chair of the Decentralization Task Force for the Initiative for Policy Dialogue. Among his awards are the W.J.M. Mackenzie Prize for best political science book.