The Greatest Sentence in the English Language

Anselm said that if it is understood, it exists in the understanding. But could i not also be said to have in my understanding any number of false things that have no real existence at all in themselves? If some one were to speak of them, i would understand whatever he said. In the same way that any false or doubtful things can. And so i am not said to think of what i have heard or to have it in my thought, but to understand it and have it inMy understanding. This is what a headache feels like, exactly. It's rough. Well, yes, but i don't think changing the order would have helped me very he can perhaps reply,.