Contrasting Closing Arguments: NY State vs. Federal Court

The chapter delves into the differences in closing arguments between New York State Court procedures and federal court procedures, focusing on the approaches of defense and prosecution attorneys. It highlights the unique format in New York where defense presents first, followed by prosecution, and discusses the impact on the jury's perception of the case. The chapter provides detailed analysis of specific arguments made by the prosecution in a courtroom case involving various exhibits, emphasizing the nuances of legal arguments presented during the trial.