The Relationship Between Hegelian Dialectic and Logic

The subject is not lost purely in the machinic process of the structural combination. That's out of the imaginary misrecognition. I think you could say that this is, like, the level of dialectics here. Mm-hmm. And then maybe the more proper juzhakian understanding of the Hegelian dialectic, we can see that in the kind of advent of the Bart other in the con. This was interesting. He said that with the Bart other, because there's a void in the signifier that accompanies the movement of symbolization. Which I think is what to lose.