I'm a Structuralist in a Vacuum

The purpose of altisserie and marxist science is to see things that we haven't been able to see right um pointing. i mean in the process of responding to certain things that he sees as errors he is going to prop up their sort of alternatives right like if he's so. I'm not trying to forward something in a vacuum  is that more or less kind of what you're saying such that you can't really label him as a structuralist once and for all? He's propping up kind of structuralist arguments against people that aren't structuralist enough if you will. That could give his whole philosophy the sense that it's essentially this thing but it's really