AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
2min chapter
Episode 62: Publishing in Scientific Journals
Materialism: A Materials Science Podcast
Is It Okay to Provide Critical Feedback After a Paper Is Published?
The role of the review is not to rubber stamp your work. It's to provide you critical feedback so you can ensure that your work is best quality. Who actually knows is familiar with what you're doing who can really provide that objective critical feedback? Those are the folks who should be your reviewers. If you review a paper, is it okay to tell them afterwards after it's published? Hey, I was the review on this. As an editor, I will never break that confidentiality.
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode