Navigating Decision Rules in Medicine

This chapter examines the complexities of decision rules in medical practice, highlighting their subjective nature and the resulting variability in patient risk assessments among different doctors. The discussion critiques the limitations of tools like the Nexus and Heart scores, arguing that reliance on such rigid guidelines can detract from personal judgment and meaningful patient interactions. It also explores the potential role of artificial intelligence in enhancing clinical decision-making while cautioning against uncritical acceptance of AI outputs.