Are Celestial Globes a Valid Representation of Reality?

Super chat al hes coming after you. Brian, so do you accept celestial globes as valid representations of reality, just not what the objects are? Thas, say, asep tin? God aset, the same gys from minute decible, the same guod who asked lestial globes feet. Try and be more precise. No, i think it's more of a, of a celestial dome, if you will. And we're at the bottom. You know, nothing's really underneath us. In most models, so i must say, it's a we're atthe bottom. I hope i was concise. But ma ta is put in a couple chests

Transcript

Play full episode

Transcript

Episode notes

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!

Get the app