I would not say that the lits who governed the pandem fali. were flawless, or that they should not be subject to criticism. But i am expressing a certain sympathy for the scepticism that the public has of experts. I think there's a broader point that you're making that is very much in line with the critique i offer in the tyranny of merit which has to do with technocratic experts. We have assumed wrongly, that virtue in governing, excellence or merit in governing, is largely to be defined in terms of technocratic expertis. And this, i think, is one of the defects of maritocracy that we've seen in recent decades with regard to governing.
Freddie Sayers meets Michael Sandel.
Do we deserve what we have? Are the elites any better than the rest of us? Do the right people get to run the world?
One political philosopher who attempts to tackle these big questions is Professor Michael Sandel. A Harvard professor since the 1980s and world famous author of many bestselling books, including 'What Money Can't Buy', and most recently, 'The Tyranny of Merit', Sandel has made the case for overhauling Western neoliberalism. The alternative society Sandel suggests is more forgiving of failure and confers cultural status onto building community rather than capital.
In a wide-ranging conversation with Freddie Sayers, Sandel explores how elite institutions from the Ivy League to Wall Street have given us the wrong idea about who deserves power.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.