My first impulse is to believe the attorney over her, but you know, avything's possible. We're in this weird world where maybe the attorney forgot he wrote it, and couldn't tell his own handwriting or something. I mean, none of this makes any sense. But when you're in a situation where nothing makes sense, maybe your a opinion should be there too, that we don't know what's going on. There's just something here that doesn't make sense. A but certainly somebody who may have lied about a handwritten note. Why should you believe about anything else that person says? Suppose, suppose it became validated? You'd actually just check the handwriting. That would