Debating Atonement: Scapegoats vs. Substitution

This chapter invites listeners to engage in a discussion about the scapegoat atonement theory and its implications within evangelical contexts. The host critiques contemporary interpretations of atonement influenced by sociopolitical views, emphasizing the need for grounding in biblical scripture. The conversation highlights the historical significance of substitutionary atonement while challenging the validity of newer theories, particularly those proposed by René Girard.