There has been a fair amount of pushback on that view, because researchers who spent a long time working on ameloid bater research. Charles understands where these people are coming from. I have great respect for many of the scientists who have been exploring ameloid reasons behind alsheimers. And i think some of it may still be fruitful and important. This potential misconduct should be like a wake up call.
This past July, a bombshell report in Science magazine suggested that a key Alzheimer’s study might have contained manipulated evidence. What does this mean for over a decade's worth of research? And where does the field go from here?
For more, go to http://vox.com/unexplainable
It’s a great place to view show transcripts and read more about the topics on our show.
Also, email us! unexplainable@vox.com
We read every email.
Support Unexplainable by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices