If we can detach spurious claims of deservingness from various positions and an admission schemes, then i have no objection to trying to find those who are best suited for this or that social role. The question is, do we heap upon the winners, not only income and wealth and and, but also honor and recognition and prestige and respect? That's what i'm challenging. Let me put it another way, if i need surgery, i want a well qualified surgeon to perform it. But merit, in that sense, is independent of the question of deservingness - freddy. I don't think that the successful need torment themselve to recognize the role of luck, or the indebtedness
Freddie Sayers meets Michael Sandel.
Do we deserve what we have? Are the elites any better than the rest of us? Do the right people get to run the world?
One political philosopher who attempts to tackle these big questions is Professor Michael Sandel. A Harvard professor since the 1980s and world famous author of many bestselling books, including 'What Money Can't Buy', and most recently, 'The Tyranny of Merit', Sandel has made the case for overhauling Western neoliberalism. The alternative society Sandel suggests is more forgiving of failure and confers cultural status onto building community rather than capital.
In a wide-ranging conversation with Freddie Sayers, Sandel explores how elite institutions from the Ivy League to Wall Street have given us the wrong idea about who deserves power.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.