Confucianism and Daoism - Is the Tao Not the Real Dao?

Both confucianism and these daist thinkers that i am talking about came from this period called the hundred schools of thought, which last from the sixth century to two 21 b c in china. So we have the tao saying that the tao that can be spoken of is not the real dao. Here's danza, maybe a hundred, maybe 200 years later, and he writes saying, is not blowing breath, saying, says thing. The only trouble is that what it says is never fixed. Do we really say something, or have we never said anything? If you think it is different from the twitter of fledgelings, is there any proof by what is