Osinga's Abstract of Discourse?

Osinga provides a general intellectual framework for reading boyd. He's really just summarizing what boyd is going to say. abduction is this kind of focus on where something comes out of the research process that is original and is neither deduction nor induction. Cilots wants at man here. A, yes, shall he actual we roll into it them argoha? i was actually trying to figure out, is this closer to dialectics, or o to abduction? Or is it somewhere between both?