The whole thing settled down to about 60. There was a lot of chaotic noise around that, and it was a weird thing. Physicist got this right away. And my good friend at the time, per back, took this problem facted to all his physics frnd suddenly the problem became famous in physics. Economists didn't quite know what to make of it. Their usual solution was to say, everybody's identical by assumption. As i said, h doesn't work in this problem. What does work is an inductive approach. I think maybe these possibilities for forecasting might work. Somebody else might think other possibilities work.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode