If i could choose between having everyone in the world be more psychologically informed or ending hunger, i would choose ending hunger. Even if you don't have that much agency to change late stage capitalism in the aggregate, on the other hand, you have a lot of agency and you can overcome the propaganda of defeat. The straw man argument here is very much framed as either or, right? You're either in the world or you're saving yourself. Choose. And no, it's not either or. We can do both. At any moment in time, we might see somebody who's more focused on one or the other. But ultimately, they're supportive of one another.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode