I think what's happened is, almost every time i've had a founder talk to the new york times and give them the benefit of the doubt, they've been treated unfairly. I do think like face books should be accountable. But you're the one encouraging anonymous sources, because every journalist would rather have it on the record and attribute it. And instead they want the only people in town who will talk to them. They would much rather have it all day on the record. If you actually saw the primary documents, yethey spoke for themselves. A lot of journalists are coming to the table, i think, with this advocacy approach. You know, they rally having a genda base