Nostrodomas' Quatrains Are Not Ambiguous or Amphibological

Do you think bibliomancy fully explains what nostrodomas was doing in composing the quatrains? I suspect it was a big part of what he was doing, but i don't think it was all of it. If nastrotomis believed that his repeats could some of the events repeat more than once before the year 37 97,. Could a person claim that there are multiple fulfilments for a single quatrain so that whenever a person like alexander the great appears, it would count as a new fulfilment of a quatrain about a new alexander appearing? Think so. And this would be a very good way for nostrodomus