De Laus and Indifference and Repeatation

I'd actually read that quite slightly differently. I take De Laus there to be following Leibniz in talking about the way that individuals are constituted within a composable world, within a single world. So this is a world of determined individuals in which things relate to one another in a law-like way. But the question then becomes, how does the individual transcend its particular individuation within this world? And it's at this point that we need to start talking about divergent worlds. Something appears for the individual within its world, which seems to belong to impossible worlds. It seems to be in common to different possible worlds. In other words, something emerges, or the individual