Non-Cantatund Morphology Is Not Cantatative

In theory, we could talk endlessly about this sort of thing. But I'm not sure that it's in the world of theory necessarily useful to think that non-cantatund morphology is notable or that it is especially useful to say this is non-Cantative. It's just a description of a particular kind of morphology that is the result of long-running phonological processes that are completely normal in every other way. So these distinctions seem to provide evidence against the standard of the standard morphing theory anyway.