Liberal Democracy

Papist wereins don't go into specifics because they don't want to have to contend with compelling ideas. By lumping everyone together in broad strokes, suggesting that they're just kind of angry and maybe like, anti authoritarian, this then allows libera pop historians to present politics rite a simplisitic, two dimensional either perhaps in the best light or it's sort of overly idealistic. It really cand of allowing them to suggest that radicals, broadly conceived, no matter what sector o radical they are speaking about, they don't have any solutions. You're not a part of the real world.