Is There an Argument for Universality That Isn't Instinctly Universalist?

I don't know how you can make even an argument without some implicit reference to the universal. I think that's what people hear when they hear universality, because it doesn't seem to allow for difference. Like if just, if everybody can approach something differently, and all is subjective, then there's nothing ever means anything. That's the total danger of diving into the headlong dive away from this notion of like a particular which allows for difference. So once you say always, you've already given up the game, right? Right?"