Is There Any Explication of the Concept of Legitimacy?

i take a lot from hydegerian and ganbenian fucodian mode of critiquing dominant forms of liberal political thought. But i don't know that they, they're really going to have the fine grain detail that they pout. If if there's no possible way we could have a legitimate social order, or even just a policy, within an unjust social order, then you're only going to fall back on individual notions of freedom. So it seems to me like you have to have some positive notion of freedom coming generally, i think, from like the contand hegand lines of thought. It comes in line with what Riad says: Freedom is