Is There a Real Dedecher?

I like how it got to the heart of your intervention and the co authord work of the du in casine, which is kind of what we alluded to earlier. Your intervention was to say, it's not about choosing equevosity or univosity. It's not necessarily about ot sort of choosing the puns or the mathenes. We've also a tendency to down play the mad gimes and say that lecon was just falking arond, or didn't know what he was doing. When i think that there there's something, there's a lot to be lost in either take, in trying to split lacon, so to speak.