Is It a Cause, or a Justification of the Situation?

I mean, this is part of problem with the conversation about it too, is, like you said earlier, jumping to causal explanations. And i would add two justifications, right? Like, natov expansionism is obviously an important aspect of the history of setting up the conditions for the situation. But in the end, your opinions don't really make a difference to the situation. In any case. You're just providing justification for one side or for the other. It's never been unipolar or by polar in the first place. That should be the title of a book we write. We have never been by polar, something like that, right? That would be a better title for