Is There a Universal for Woman at Ta?

Pa says, lecon earlier translation, chose to retain the french article and to render his formula the woman does not exist. But since lecon does not comment specifically on this article, there was no need to keep in english such a non English way of expressing a category. And then often times you'll get either, i think in semenar 20, woman itself is crossed outright? Yeas the translation quite often. That's inn those later chapters that get into the m as we talked about before, the m what is it the for the forma ex e for form e sexuation. In the french, it's the law that's crossed out. So it'st the, it