Is There a More Expansive Conception of Science?

Eron: We need to take philosophy more seriously in theorizing about the nature of reality. The subtite of my book is towards a new science of consciousness. I'm thinking, i mean, we can neiver have a more expansive conception of science. It's going to be harder to establish with it if we're just reasoning rather than doing experiments. And because there are things we know to be real that aren't known on the basis of public observation experiments. That would be fair point. If my motivation was empirical, but my motivation is philosophical. There are empirical se s i've already mentioned who take strong emergence seriously as well. How the hell does mary learn nothing about the