Are You Still Being Inclusive?

In you have to import a partiality into god if you want to interpret the us to mean only a few chosen eternally, immutably forever. And how's that love? You know, when there's that partiality that everybody else's ased by, everybody else is left to be reprobate. Ah, there's no opportunity, no sufficiency, to give them the opportunity o to seek him. I think the in laves is is in the right place in the sense of being awkward, because it does go with the choosing and predestination. Actually, the predestination is is another is a participle that actually is connected to the choosing as well.