The Dangers of Believers Without Evidence

i am just open to the broader range of phenomena that i guess would be called supernatural because they don't fit in with our current understanding of natural laws. we have this fight over it texts you ask me if i believe in some specific thing well you said ghosts yeah and so as a Bayesian there is zero reason like  if i'm a good Bayesian like the prior that i said is zero to believe that there is like a real supernatural entity that has ever affected this world.