
Ep: 108 Steven Pinker’s ”Rationality”Chapter 3 ”Logic and Critical Thinking” - reflections and analysis.
ToKCast
00:00
What Is the Difference Between Formal and Informal Fallacies?
In the next section is called formal reconstruction, which is about how we could take an argument in theory and decompose into its illogical sequence to figure out whether or not it's valid or sound. I don't find this of much use, because i don't think things ever really occur this way. In a court of law, for example, the argument is ever broken down into the basic symbols of logic and then proved. Now, pinker goes on to spend a long time analyzing a particular argument given by the democrat presidential candidate andrew yang. And he reconstructs this informal logic to some extent along the way, describing yang as being admirably explicit with his platform and
Play episode from 01:09:23
Transcript


