Every so often a new study appears that claims that breastfed children are smarter, healthier, or otherwise better off later in life than those who were fed baby formula.
In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart look into one recent such study, and ask what the research in general tells us about the apparently-dramatic effects of breastfeeding. Should you feel terribly guilty if you can’t, or choose not to, breastfeed your baby? Or is this an example of weak evidence being blown out of proportion?
The Studies Show is sponsored by Works in Progress magazine, the best place to find insightful essays on science, technology, and human progress. We’re very grateful for their support.
Listen above, or on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, or any other podcast provider.
If you like the sound of The Studies Show, then please consider becoming a subscriber. You can join as a free subscriber and get an email whenever we release an episode. If you join as a paid subscriber, you’ll be able to access some features like ask-me-anything chats with Tom and Stuart, and (soon) paid-only episodes. Either way, you can subscribe right here:
Show notes
* The new study claiming breastfed children get better GCSE results
* Stuart’s Twitter thread critiquing the study
* The WHO page stating that breastfed children “perform better on intelligence tests”
* Brazilian study of breastfeeding and intelligence (and other outcomes)
* Initial report of the Belorussian breastfeeding-promotion randomised controlled trial
* Age-16 follow-up of the RCT
* Sibling-control study of breastfeeding and intelligence
* Stuart’s Substack post on breastfeeding and intelligence
* Tom’s article on the breastfeeding controversy
Credits
The Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit
sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe
