The Limits of Darwinism

Science has its domain and theology can encompass science quite comfortably then. I don't think people are mature enough to understand that point, which is why we have to actually fight these battles. From a purely philosophical point of view, Darwinism should not even be a problem. But if you are to come up with an absolute watertight argument, like for example, the contingency argument, you don't need anything else. So we have to not only look at what is intellectually satisfying, but we also have to look at what pragmatically is going to work. That's where me and Shreib have a difference. And so that there is, the emphasis there is people keeping in their respective lanes