Moral Realism - What Happened to Good and Evil?

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The conception of data I'm working with is that of a claim that inquirers considered collectively have good reason to believe at the outset of inquiry. That claim is as we put it, is flossed with it, defeasible. But sorry is that data? That's that data is like I said when I'm asking. It's data in this sense. If you can't provide that, then accounting for that data is a constraint on the development of the theory that's going to yield illumination of domain in question.

Despite occasional and important disagreements, most people are in rough agreement about what it means to be moral, to do the right thing. There’s much less agreement about why we should be moral, or even what kind of answer to that question could be convincing. Philosopher Russ Shafer-Landau is one of the leading proponents of moral realism — the view that objective moral truths exist independently of human choices. That’s not my own view, but ethics and meta-ethics are areas in which I think it’s wise to keep an open mind and listen to smart people who disagree. This conversation offers food for thought for people on either side of this debate.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Russ Shafer-Landau received his Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Arizona. He is currently Professor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Among his numerous books are Moral Realism: A Defense and Whatever Happened to Good and Evil? He is the editor of Oxford Studies in Metaethics, and is the founder and organizer of the annual Madison Metaethics Workshop.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.