The Application of Detestable Findings

1min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

It is potentially fatal error to think that it's not alive when it actually is. You can't go back in time and see whether or not people who saw as were less likely to di It's a just so story. There are, there are just so stories,. O, you know, it's like, now that's rice. We could talk about these kinds of arguments. we've talked about them in the context of, like, morality and likeplied to ethical intuitions inethical bl way back when we talked about evolutionary dbunking arguments from orald.

Panpsychism didn't give us river spirits or mischievous sootballs, so this time we go straight to the source - a defense of animism, and in a top 10 analytic philosophy journal. Could a failed argument for the existence of God establish the existence of trees and mountains with “interiority” and “social characteristics”? Tamler wants to believe, but is the argument that'll push him over the edge?

Plus – speaking of top journals, a doozy of social psych article: Is forgiveness better than revenge at rehumanizing the self? Let's check the voodoo dolls to find out. Tamler is delighted by David’s reaction to this one.