Episode 464: Rehiring an overpaid boomerang and AI has taken over my teammate's brain
Soft Skills Engineering
Navigating Code Craftsmanship and Collaboration
This chapter explores the balance between individual coding styles and the collective needs of development teams, highlighting the importance of open dialogue and shared standards. It emphasizes the evolving impact of AI on software practices, advocating for adaptation while maintaining team cohesion and enhancing productivity.
In this episode, Dave and Jamison answer these questions:
-
Mr A. N. Onymous says,
Hi Dave and Jamison,
Long time listened, second time caller! I wrote a little while back with a common new-manager question about how to handle one of my reports who was at the lower end performance wise, but at the top end on the pay scale. I’d been trying to manage it by getting raises for the rest of the team in order to balance things out a bit (and make the rest of the team happy). I did consider Limogeage but having them on the team was better than a vacancy.
Fast forward a year or so, and the problem resolved itself when this team member left - or so I thought. We’ve had a few months gap before opening recruitment again, and it turns out this team member wasn’t happy at their new role and has applied to come back. Given they negotiated well with us the first time I’m guessing they’ve had a healthy pay bump at their new role. What should I do?
On the one hand I know their performance, they do deliver well and I’m happy working with them and managing them. Would it be rude to offer them to come back at their previous salary (assuming they’re the “best” person when we interview)? Will they be offended if we don’t offer them the role?
We haven’t had interviews yet - so help me Dave and Jamison, you’re my only hope!
-
AI has taken over my team mate’s brain. HELP!
I work for a ~10ish or so team building a B2B finances related app for several platforms (mobile, web, backend, etc). On the Web team, there’s only two of us.
I’ve been on this team for around 4 years now, and during this times I’ve had several coworkers (the previous ones have either left the company voluntarily or involuntarily, moved to other teams, or completely left the field). I’m 100% convinced it’s not because of me, so let’s take that out of the question right away :-). All of this to say is that I tend to be the person that knows the most about our (quite large) codebase.
We work on a ten-year-old React application with some technical debt, but overall I think it’s pretty good.
My coworker comes from Android development. While he’s a great developer and has AMAZING soft skills (probably a listener of this podcast!, or maybe not because he has not quit yet?) he’s a little bit lacking on the general “Web Stuff (TM)” knowledge and many of the specifics details of our codebase.
A bigger problem is that he seems to have totally given up on learning web skills or understanding our codebase and is instead just tab-tab-tab-ing autocompleted AI crap all over the codebase.
His code works as expected, but when reviewing his PRs I feel like a slave of the AI. I’m not reviewing another human’s work, but just what some AI model is doing. While it works, it’s terrible code for another human to maintain. For example, there’s lots of “inline” crap that we already have utility functions or libraries for, regexes everywhere, custom CSS all over the place instead of using our design system, abuse of the CSS cascade instead of using our CSS-inJS solution, large files with lots of code repeating existing logic that’s already somewhere else, and code comments every 2 lines or so which provide no value, but that’s what AI does to explain things.
I’m not against AI (I also have explicitly to say this to prevent it killing me in the future). I use it for explaining things to me, writing utility functions, suggesting improvements, or as a google search replacement that saves a lot of time.
But leaving AI to do your work mindlessly while you sip orange juice and watch how it codes is wrong. We’re not there yet. These PRs work and are difficult to reject because management wants to ship fast. However, they are harming the codebase. We’ll get to the point where only AI will be able to touch it due to the amount of repetition, duplication and overall non-human friendly code.
How do I tell this person “Please stop doing this and instead learn things properly, and use AI as a tool and stop you being the tool of the AI” without hurting any feelings, and without being seen as the AI grinch?
Thanks for your help! Love the podcast, and why scroll keeps jumping up when writing on this form? Seems like AI is boycotting me.
The AI-powered Podcast Player
