What's So Great About the Film?

The film is almost schematic, e organized right between those three. So we ave yo, the police, have tak yuapalist, and then we have police, and then We have the revolution. And they're using this to am, organize, to tot. Theyre recognized a their um, their lack, and they have a leader. And there is something different. It's tempting, if you're lacanian to say, like, capital, symbolic, police, imaginary divide between the two, and the ion revolutionary, real. But i think that isn't what you're getting at. That this is precisely the o isia, right? Ye, tisone