After the charley edbo attacks, i remember you were tweeding something at there was a hashtak called spread the risk. The thing that bugs me about this is, there's no risk to condemning some random stranger who's on a flight to africa. There's just no risk. There's nothing. You're not the condemnation can only benefit you cause it shows that you have the right thoughts about this kind of ss. Andit, it has a a huge effect on public discourse. This is, and it'sthis something that nichi captured in in one of his aphorisms, goes something like, whenever you force a person to change his mind about you, he
Sam Harris gets back in the VBW ring for another round on moral responsibility, ethical theories, and the grounds for our obligations to other people. Are we at a genuine stalemate when it comes to blame and desert? Is Tamler a closet consequentialist? Is Sam a closet pluralist? Why is Dave such a big Wagner fan? Plus, Twitter shaming: what is it good for? Settle in, get comfortable, pour yourself a drink, you’re in for the long haul on this one.
Links
Special Guest: Sam Harris.
Support Very Bad Wizards