Crisis Decision-Making in Hurricane Katrina

This chapter explores the challenges of decision-making faced by government officials during Hurricane Katrina, emphasizing the reliance on external experts amidst chaos. Additionally, it reflects on the current political climate in Washington D.C., highlighting the tension and cautious optimism around leadership changes and party dynamics.

Transcript

chevron_right

Play full episode

chevron_right

Transcript

Episode notes

Record your first video with Riverside - https://creators.riverside.fm/Codie - and use code CODIE for 15% off an individual plan.

In this weeks episode Codie interviews Ryan Streeter, director of the Civitas Institute at the University of Texas. They discuss the role of think tanks in shaping policy, the importance of war games in decision-making, and the current state of higher education. Streeter shares insights on the creation of the Civitas Institute, aimed at reclaiming the principles of a free society within academia, and the growing interest in multidisciplinary education that counters the political monoculture prevalent in many universities today. The conversation delves into the pressing issues surrounding student loan debt, the need for reform in university funding, and the commercialization of university research. It discusses the value of a university education, the role of MBAs, and the importance of building ethical organizations. The dialogue also emphasizes the need for students and parents to navigate college choices carefully in today's complex educational landscape. In this conversation, the speaker discusses various themes surrounding voter motivations, economic concerns, the reliability of polls, education policy, and the prevailing optimism among working-class Americans. The dialogue highlights the disconnect between elite narratives and the sentiments of ordinary citizens, particularly regarding public safety, economic issues, and the impact of media narratives on perceptions of the American dream. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of critically evaluating survey data and understanding the broader context of political discussions.

Here are the studies Ryan and Codie mentioned: