
SCOTUS Leans on Constitutional Avoidance in United States v. Hansen
Cato Podcast
00:00
The Court's Interpretation of the First Amendment
The government relied heavily on the doctrine of so-called constitutional avoidance. Courts have said we have an obligation to read it in a way that does not violate the Constitution, he says. The court completely bought the government's argument and they bought the narrow interpretation of the law, writes O'Mara.
Transcript
Play full episode